Skip to main content
AR you kidding me?
To:Brew Readers
IT Brew // Morning Brew // Update
Smart glasses present a security and privacy problem for IT pros.

It’s Monday! Uh oh. Fall is suddenly starting to feel like winter, at least here in New York City. Here’s a literal hot tip if you need the extra heat: Print stuff all day and stay near that warm paper.

In today’s edition:

AR(gh!)

Washed up

Whose turn to shuffle?

—Billy Hurley, Brianna Monsanto, Eoin Higgins

HARDWARE

A portrait of Joe Jones, director of research and insights at nonprofit privacy organization, IAPP

Joe Jones

Pop-ups, privacy notices, and consent checks provide a tiny bit of order in our unwieldy digital world, especially when it comes to pictures and videos of you. Some company-issued notifications, for example, might prompt you to agree to a platform or organization’s use of your likeness in a captured photo.

It’s harder to read that kind of fine print, however, with an unfamiliar pair of glasses—specifically augmented-reality (AR) ones. Our digital social contract becomes even more difficult to enforce if there are a million people with stylish eyewear that’s capable of recording you instantly.

“How do you roll that out, when you have, say, a million individuals with glasses just walking around, living their lives? Are they to wear T-shirts or signage that says, ‘Hey, I’m not myopic, I’m not [near]-sighted. I’m wearing these glasses because I’d like to take pictures of everyone as I walk about doing my daily life,’” Joe Jones, director of research and insights at nonprofit privacy organization IAPP, told IT Brew with a laugh.

Jones spoke with us about security and privacy risks—as well as the upside—of wearables as this technology becomes more advanced.

What you can (and can’t) control.BH

Presented By ThreatLocker

SOFTWARE

A robot Customer Service AI Assistant typing on laptop

Brittany Holloway-Brown, Photo: Top Stock / Adobe Stock

A pig in lipstick is still a pig, a mouse in armor is still a mouse, and a piece of non-agentic software marketed as agentic but with no real agentic capabilities is still…non-agentic software.

Tech leaders shopping for new software are encountering a new spin on the not-so-new problem of AI washing: agent-washing.

Agent-washing, you say? Gartner defines agent-washing as products “inaccurately labeled or rebranded as AI agents or agentic AI,” causing confusion for customers. The research firm said the practice is currently “commonplace” within the industry.

Philip Carter, general manager and group VP for IDC’s AI, data, and automation research practice, said agent-washing is the “biggest gap ever between vendor hype around an emerging technology…versus organizational readiness to adopt” the technology.

One problem: Buyers have too many options.BM

IT OPERATIONS

Split photo collage showing a close-up of office items in a cardboard box on the left side, and a close-up of business people's shoes as they walk forward on the right side.

Illustration: Morning Brew Design, Photos: Adobe Stock, Getty Images

It might be a sign of underlying strength in the market, or it might be shuffling deck chairs on the AI Titanic—whatever you call it, the tech C-suite had a lot of movement across organizations in October.

AWS snags a new AI security executive

Chet Kapoor, former CEO of DataStax, moved to Amazon Web Services, where he will become VP of AI security services and observability. CEO Matt Garman made the announcement in a companywide email on Oct. 13.

Kapoor led DataStax as chairman and CEO from October 2019 to July 2025; formerly, he worked as a VP at Google for three years, spent nearly a decade as CEO of Apigee, and was a VP at IBM, among other positions.

In his email to staff, Garman framed Kapoor’s appointment as part of AWS’s adjustment to a changing security market: “As we have seen our customers’ cloud deployments get more complex over time, providing outstanding external security and observability services has become a more important part of our business, and AI is completely changing what is possible and what is needed in this area.”

Also: Two of Pennsylvania’s top tech execs are taking off.—EH

Together With Obsidian Security

PATCH NOTES

Picture of data with "Clean Me" written on it + bottle of cleaner in front of it, Patch Notes

Francis Scialabba

Today’s top IT reads.

Stat: 18%. That’s the proportion of comments on Reddit’s r/Parenting subreddit that mention kids’ use of technology, including devices, screen time, and YouTube. (Pew Research Center)

Quote: “What you have here is 50,000 tracks a day that are competing with human musicians. You have a new, hyperscalable competitor and, moreover, this competitor that was built by exploitation.”—Ed Newton-Rex, founder of a non-profit that ensures generative AI companies’ data-training is fair to artists, on the rise of AI slop on Spotify (The Guardian)

Read: The painful lesson of the “Hackintosh.” (IEEE Spectrum)

Essential reading: The November edition of ThreatLocker magazine is dishing out insights you won’t want to miss. Think: how groups like DragonForce have changed the game and how to fight exfiltration attacks. Flip through.*

*A message from our sponsor.

SHARE THE BREW

Share IT Brew with your coworkers, acquire free Brew swag, and then make new friends as a result of your fresh Brew swag.

We’re saying we’ll give you free stuff and more friends if you share a link. One link.

Your referral count: 5

Click to Share

Or copy & paste your referral link to others:
itbrew.com/r/?kid=9ec4d467

         
ADVERTISE // CAREERS // SHOP // FAQ

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here.
View our privacy policy here.

Copyright © 2025 Morning Brew Inc. All rights reserved.
22 W 19th St, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10011

Top insights for IT pros

From cybersecurity and big data to cloud computing, IT Brew covers the latest trends shaping business tech in our 4x weekly newsletter, virtual events with industry experts, and digital guides.

A mobile phone scrolling a newsletter issue of IT Brew